Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2013, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (48): 8401-8406.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.48.017
Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Shao-fei1, 2, Zhao Jian-ning1, 2, Guo Ting2
Online:
2013-11-26
Published:
2013-11-26
Contact:
Guo Ting, M.D., Associate chief physician, Associate professor, Clinical College of Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China; Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region of PLA, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China
guotingli@vip.sina.com
About author:
Li Shao-fei★, Studying for master’s degree, Clinical College of Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China; Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region of PLA, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China
leeshaofei@gmail.com
Supported by:
Special Projects of Science and Technology of Clinical Medicine in Jiangsu Province, No. BL2012002*
CLC Number:
Li Shao-fei, Zhao Jian-ning, Guo Ting . Diagnosis and treatment of thrombosis during the perioperative period of joint replacement[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2013, 17(48): 8401-8406.
2.1 围手术期深静脉血栓/肺动脉栓塞高危因素 2.1.1 手术组织损伤 关节置换为骨科大手术,创伤大,时间长,术中出血多,置换过程可导致软组织血管壁及内皮细胞损伤,导致组织因子等促凝物质释放,启动内外源性凝血途径,假体植入过程中骨髓脂肪颗粒、骨水泥单体等可逆行入血导致血液中出现不溶物质,上述多种因素均可导致患者凝血功能紊乱[4]。 2.1.2 置换后卧床、患肢固定 患者置换后一般卧床3 d,高龄患者可能卧床时间更久,该过程即可造成全身血液缓滞,红细胞聚集力增强,血黏度增高,部分患者卧床期间穿防旋鞋制动,或因疼痛而不敢活动肢体,使下肢肌肉的收缩减弱,静脉血回流失去了肌肉的泵作用,加之肢体创伤肿胀,压迫深静脉,致使局部血液瘀滞,堆积的凝血因子激活凝血系统,促使血栓形成[5]。虽有医生鼓励患者卧床期间积极功能锻炼,但文献报道在髋关节置换后住院期间进行床上锻炼似乎并没有额外的好处[6-7]。 2.1.3 置换后疼痛 患者置换后疼痛、应激过程及情绪波动,导致内分泌异常,促使肾上腺素、内皮素、5-羟色胺等大量分泌,上述激素类物质可在一定程度上导致患者置换后高凝状态持续加重。并易诱发深静脉血栓和肺动脉栓塞的发生[8]。 2.1.4 置换后补液 根据文献报道,当患者置换后每日补液量超过1 000 mL,相当于70 kg成年人体内血液稀释20%以上,会显著促成患者置换后高凝状态,具体机制尚未阐明[9]。有学者研究认为,在血液稀释的情况下,凝血酶与抗凝血酶的动态平衡被打破,而抗凝血酶功能受稀释影响更大。置换后第1天,患者排气后即可进食,鼓励早期进食,补充能量和液体量,利于置换后恢复[10]。 2.1.5 置换后置管 静脉内留置导管是深静脉血栓重要的致病原因,尤其是中心静脉插管和起搏器。静脉导管置入后对静脉造成的损伤、局部淤血、导管周围血栓形成等,最终引起置管静脉阻塞。此外,导管口径、穿刺次数、导管放置时间和经导管注药成分等因素与深静脉血栓的发病风险相关[11-12]。 2.2 深静脉血栓和肺动脉栓塞临床表现特征 2.2.1 急性深静脉血栓患者临床表现 呈多样性,且差异性较大,根据易巍等[13]报道,通过影像科确诊的126例急性深静脉血栓患者中各种临床症状的发生率依次为:①胀感77%。②疼痛:73.8%。③浅静脉怒张73%。④下肢肿胀71.4%。⑤凹陷性水肿67.5%。⑥皮肤暗红及皮温升高67.5%。⑦Homans征 64.3%。⑧Neuhof征 41.3%。⑨心悸22.2%。⑩股三角区压痛17.5%。 沉重感 15.1%。 发热 15.1%。临床症状虽然多样,但特异性不高,可与很多血管性疾病混淆,故实验室及其他相关临床检查手段在深静脉血栓确诊中起主要作用。 2.2.2 肺动脉栓塞临床表现 从无症状到猝死,呈多样性,没有特异性,呼吸困难、气促心动过速、胸闷、胸痛/胸膜性胸痛、晕厥、发绀、发热、咳嗽、及咯血是肺栓塞的常见临床表现,占96%以上[14],据尹春琳等[15]分析132例肺动脉栓塞患者临床表现,比例依次为:呼吸困难(89.4%)、胸闷(62.1%)、发热(10.6%)、胸痛/胸膜性胸痛(26.5/2.3%)、咳嗽(23.5%)、晕厥(22%)、发绀(9.1%)、咯血(6.8%)、头晕(18.2%)、乏力(4.5%)、黑朦(6.8%)、出汗(22.7%)。 2.3 深静脉血栓及肺动脉栓塞临床诊断方法 2.3.1 胸部X射线片 肺动脉栓塞患者在发病后12-36 h或数天内即可出现线胸片的改变,田治海等[16]对确诊的29例肺栓塞患者胸部X射线表现进行分析结果发现肺栓塞早期线表现多样并以肺缺血 Westermark征为典型表现,明莫瑜[17]对55例肺栓塞患者行正侧位X射线胸片检查,其中肺炎样改变38.2%,胸腔积液21.8%,肺动脉高压征象20%以及20%无阳性表现说明肺栓塞患者X射线胸片虽无特异性改变,但通过对比患者术前术后X射线平片可为肺栓塞诊断提供线索[18]。 2.3.2 D-二聚体 血浆D-二聚体浓度升高对诊断深静脉血栓/肺动脉栓塞均有一定参考价值[19-20],但为非特异性指标。以血浆D-二聚体的0.5 mg/L为阳性界点,诊断肺动脉栓塞的敏感性、特异性分别为89.9%,67.2%[21],该检验的阳性结果反映了血管内有纤维蛋白的存在,可用于血栓筛查。除血栓疾病外,肝脏疾病、炎症、恶性肿瘤、怀孕、创伤及近期手术均可使其升高[22]。该检测结果还受血栓的大小范围、出现症状后检测时间及抗凝治疗的影响。仅凭D-二聚体水平不能确诊肺栓塞,但阴性有助于排除肺栓塞。Cosmi等[23]研究表明,肺栓塞患者接受抗凝治疗后,若D-二聚体恢复正常,其复发肺栓塞的概率仅为4.4%/年,对预后评价有较高参考价值[24]。 2.3.3 超声 现为主流检测下肢静脉血栓手段,非侵入性检测,无放射性,分加压超声成像和多普勒超声,加压超声在诊断下肢近端血栓的灵敏度为89%- 96%,特异度约94%-99%[25],该检查主要从以下几个方面评估深静脉血栓的可能性:①静脉血管的压缩性,当静脉中存在固体血栓时压缩性下降。②血流特性改变,部分或全部阻塞时异于正常情况。③血流相位性消失。当深静脉血栓存在时,最可靠的表现是静脉压缩性降低,加压超声在小腿深静脉血栓的诊断中可靠性不高[26],但结合了血流多普勒信号及超声图像的二维超声提高了诊断小腿深静脉血栓的准确率[27]。 2.3.4 计算机断层造影 该检查一般应用非离子型含碘对比剂碘普罗胺为对比剂,一次检查可一起同时检测肺动脉栓塞和深静脉血栓[28],当增强后CT净增值100 Hu后从设定的感兴趣区触发扫描,一般为肺动脉平面开始,延迟3-35 min后可从小腿中部向上扫描,把扫描后获得的薄层数据载入后处理工作站,采用容积重建获得带骨的血管图像,然后采用去骨技术,获得去骨后的完整肺动脉及下肢静脉血管图,用最大密度投影显示血管的全貌,从而直观地了解血管内有无栓塞情况。该检查缺点:①需要静脉注射含碘对比剂,有0.01%严重过敏反应发生率。②大覆盖范围联合检查无疑会增加患者的X射线辐射剂量,对单纯疑诊深静脉血栓的患者,仍推荐使用下肢多普勒超声检查作为首选的筛查手段[29],现计算机断层造影一般在患者有明确的下肢肿胀或呼吸困难等栓塞症状且常规检查结果不确定的情况下应用[30],或在患者需介入治疗前为获取更多的解剖学资料时必要时使用[31-32]。 2.3.5 磁共振静脉成像 磁共振静脉成像是近几年刚开发的新技术,该检查可通过影像直接发现血栓病变,并且可以诊断出血栓在血管内是静止的还是运动的栓子[33]。在对比剂作用下计算机可较短时间内完成血栓及其所在血管的3D重建[34],对细小血管成像更优[35],可发现血栓的具体病变部位及大小占位情况。磁共振静脉成像在深静脉血栓的诊断价值与对比静脉造影相仿,该检查可准确发现超声检查难以发现的盆腔血栓,对肺动脉栓塞也有极高的诊断价值。但是磁共振静脉成像并未广泛应用[36]。磁共振静脉成像缺点有:①费用较高,仪器昂贵。②患者体内有磁性植入物为该检查禁忌。③检查过程患者需较高配合度。④造影剂(含金属钆)可能与中晚期肾病患者肾脏纤维化有关联,患者合并肾脏疾病需慎用。 2.4 诊断深静脉血栓/肺动脉栓塞发展新方向 2.4.1 放射性同位素造影检查 可用放射性同位素125I标记患者的纤维蛋白原,当体内有新鲜血栓形成时,局部放射性增强,可准确诊断出深静脉血栓的位置及形态。最新临床应用的同位素为99Tc。Tc-99m-apcitide为一种同位素标记的肽链,与Ⅱb/Ⅲa的糖蛋白受体高度结合且特异性高,该受体高表达于因新生血栓激活的血小板上。最近一项关于99Tc与静脉造影在深静脉血栓患者诊断准确率比较的实验[37],该实验共统计了280例患者,实验结论:99Tc在深静脉血栓诊断上灵敏度90.6%,特异度83.9%,与静脉造影结论一致率为87.3%,同位素检查为深静脉血栓的诊断方法提供了新的思路。 2.4.2 血栓弹力图 血栓弹力图是一种可以直接检测全血凝血功能的检测手段[38],现已广泛应用于检测血液高凝、低凝、纤维蛋白溶解、血块强度以及抗凝药物疗效等,现已有相关研究应用血栓弹力图监测高凝状态及提示血栓发生过程。最近一项关于血栓弹力图文献系统性回顾研究的资料显示[39],关于血栓弹力图下高凝状态的定义尚无统一标准,在收集的共10个统计的实验中,6项实验主张用血栓最大幅度值(MA)> 68-70 mm为高凝(有血栓倾向)的界限。余下4项实验以凝血综合指数(CI)>3.0为高凝界限。实验结果的波动性较大,根据上述标准统计,血栓弹力图检测深静脉血栓的灵敏度在69%-80%之间,特异度在62%-92%之间,介于统计资料较少,尚无法进行Meta分析,血栓弹力图在诊断血栓方面仍需进一步探究。但关节置换后常规血栓弹力图监测可早期发现患者血液高凝状态,指导临床进行早期的抗凝治疗,从而避免血栓形成的进展过程。 2.4.3 抗人血小板单克隆抗体的研究 用121锢标记血小板特种单克隆抗体(P256)进行诊断下肢深静脉血栓的研究[40],P256能清楚地显示整个下肢深静脉血栓形成的过程,经血管造影证实,下肢深静脉血栓和肺栓塞诊断准确性一致,目前对P256的临床应用还没有进行系统的评估,尚未进行临床运用检测,近年来利用与血栓形成相关的特异性单克隆抗体,成功地进行了血栓导向显像诊断、溶栓治疗以及新型抗栓和抗血小板药物的研究,这些研究结果显示了血栓导向单抗对血栓性疾病的诊断有着良好的前景。 2.4.4 溶血磷脂酸 溶血磷脂酸属于脂类小分子物质,是又称多功能“磷脂信使”,是一种由活化血小板生产的生物活性磷脂,越来越多证据表明,溶血磷脂酸与动脉粥样硬化和血栓形成密切相关[41],该物质可在血栓形成早期由血小板产生,是检测血栓形成的标志物之一[42]。Cui[43]发现在深静脉血栓血浆中溶血磷脂酸水平显著高于未并发深静脉血栓患者,证实了在血栓形成早期溶血磷脂酸已经释放,此时检测溶血磷脂酸早期筛查对深静脉血栓诊断有临床意义。 2.5 围手术期血栓药物预防及发展方向 参照《预防骨科大手术深静脉血栓形成指南》[44],置换后抗凝治疗一般不应少于7-10 d,必要时延长至28-35 d。近50年来,低分子肝素和维生素K拮抗剂类(以华法林为代表)为主要的围手术期抗凝药物,虽疗效得到肯定,可明显降低置换后深静脉血栓发生率[45],但应用却受到诸多因素限制,低分子肝素为非口服类,不适合非住院期间及长期治疗,华法林为间接口服抗凝药物,半衰期长,用药5-7 d药效才能稳定,治疗期间需严格把握剂量,定期监测国际标准化比值(INR),且药物代谢受饮食、饮酒及多种药物等影响,若患者术后5 d出院,则应用大为不便,因此,临床需要一种可以口服,无需临床监测并可在家中长期服用的新型抗凝药物,下文介绍最新的2种现已得到临床广泛应用的抗凝剂及代表药物。 2.5.1 凝血酶直接抑制剂(代表药物:达比加群) 前体药物为达比加群酯,经口服后在体内转换成有活性的达比加群,作用机制:凝血酶是细胞外胰岛素样丝氨酸蛋白酶,在凝血过程中具有重要作用[46],一方面,其能使纤维蛋白原裂解成为纤维蛋白,后者参与构成不溶性血栓基质;另一方面,其能诱导血小板活化和聚集,进而引发一系列次级凝血级联反应。达比加群直接抑制凝血酶从而达到抗凝血作用,该药口服生物利用度约5%,半衰期14-17 h,肝脏清除率低,以肾脏排出为主[47],根据临床相关实验(RE-MODEL),在关节置换后血栓预防作用方面,每天150 mg、225 mg剂量达比加群效果不亚于40 mg依诺肝素(皮下注射)组,且关节置换后出血的不良反应发生率差异无显著性意义。最新实验(RE-COVER)比较了该药与华法林在术后6个月内血栓预防作用,结果发现达比加群效果不亚于华法林组[48],所以该药完全可以胜任长期血栓预防治疗,且治疗过程无需监测INR等凝血功能。该药不良反应以出血为主,且有明显的剂量相关性。综合来讲,达比加群是一种应用前景广阔的骨科术后抗凝药物。 2.5.2 活性X因子直接抑制剂(代表药物:利伐沙班)因子Xa是凝血酶形成的内外源通路的共同交叉点。利伐沙班选择性抑制因子Xa阻断凝血酶生成的爆炸样放大效应,高效、安全地抑制血栓形成[49]。该药的生物利用度可达80%以上,快速起效(给药后2-4 h血药浓度达峰值),终末半衰期为4-9 h,与药物之间作用小,经胆道和肾脏双通道排泄,多次给药后无蓄积且不受食物影响,且无需监测凝血功能。RECORD实验比较全髋关节置换后患者短期内皮下注射依诺肝素和置换后5周内长期口服FXa因子抑制剂利伐沙班在预防血栓预防作用。结果显示,利伐沙班组严重深静脉血栓发生率均显著低于依诺肝素组,大出血和一般出血事件的发生率在2组中相似。与依诺肝素短期用药相比,利伐沙班长期预防对全髋关节置换患者可更有效地预防深静脉血栓[50]。RECORD研究旨在比较利伐沙班和依诺肝素每天1次对全膝关节成形患者的疗效和安全性,共随机纳入2 531例患者,利伐沙班对减少严重静脉血栓栓塞更有效,可使相对危险度降低62%。利伐沙班组症状性静脉血栓栓塞发生率低于依诺肝素组。大出血和一般出血的发生率在利伐沙班组(0.6%)和依诺肝素组(0.5%)相似,其他不良事件的发生率也相似。治疗期间利伐沙班组无死亡或肺栓塞发生,依诺肝素组有2例死亡和4例肺栓塞。利伐沙班关节置换后预防血栓治疗效果显著,且安全性高,值得大规模应用。 2.5.3 新型口服抗凝药物的优点 ①高选择性,不良反应少。②临床起效快,可用于急性和慢性血栓治疗。③无明显食物影响,药物相互作用少。④多次给药无蓄积,⑤可预见性高,无需监测凝血功能。"
[1] Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Anti-thrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease:Anti-thrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed. American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012; 141:e419S-e494S. [2] Jaff MR,McMurtry MS,Archer SL,et al.Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism,iliofemoral deep veinthrombosis,and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension:a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:1788-1830. [3] Shbaklo H, Kahn SR. Long-term prognosis after deep venous thrombosis. Curr Opin Hematol. 2008;5(5): 494-498. [4] Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al.Differential value of risk factors and clinical signs for diagnosing pulmonary embolism according to age. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;311:2457-2464. [5] 张建华,邱南海.关节置换后的深静脉血栓形成[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(26):4860-4863. [6] Jesudason C, Stiller K. Are bed exercises necessary following hip arthroplasty? Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(2): 73-81. [7] Minns Lowe CJ, Barker KL, Dewey ME, et al. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;(10):98-102. [8] Stein PD,Matta F. Epidemiology and incidence:the scope of the problem and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism:Clin Chest Med. 2010; 31(4):611-628. [9] Kretschmer V, Daraktchiev A, Karger R. Does haemodilution produce a hypercoagulable state? Thromb Haemost. 2004; 92(3):670-671. [10] Zhou T, Wu XT, Zhou YJ, et al. Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients' rehabilitation after colorectostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(15): 2459-2463. [11] Evans RS, Sharp JH, Linford LH, et al. Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters. Chest. 2010;138:803-810. [12] Liem TK, Yanit KE, Moseley SE, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter usage patterns and associated symptomatic upper extremity venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(3): 761-767. [13] 易巍,徐岩. 老年急性下肢深静脉血栓症患者的临床表现分析[J]. 中国老年保健医学杂志, 2011,9(2):14-15. [14] Agnelli G, Becattini C. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;3633:266-274. [15] 尹春琳,魏嘉平,郝恒剑,等.急性肺栓塞非特异性临床表现特征分析与误诊原因探讨[J].心肺血管病杂志,2012,31(5):591-595. [16] 田治海,焦振华.肺栓塞的早期X诊断[J]. 现代医药卫生,2011, 27(13):1953-1956. [17] 明莫瑜. X线胸片在肺栓塞诊断中的临床价值[J]. 临床合理用药杂志,2012,5(4B), 60-61. [18] Elliott CG. Pulmonary embolism diagnosis in hospitalized and intensive care unit patients. Semin Vasc Med. 2001;1(2): 205-212. [19] Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Prins MH. Management studies using a combination of D-dimer test result and clinical probability to rule out venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;311:2465-2470. [20] Owings JT, Gosselin RC, Battistella FD, et al. Whole blood D-dimer assay: an effective noninvasive method to rule out pulmonary embolism.J Trauma. 2000;48(5):795-799. [21] 张丽军,王蒨.肺动脉血栓栓塞症常用诊断技术及研究进展[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(1):51-55. [22] Brotman DJ, Segal JB, Jani JT, et al. Limitations of D-dimer testing in unselected inpatients with suspected venous thromboembolism. Am J Med. 2003;1144:276-282. [23] Cosmi B,Legnani C, Tosetto A,et al.Sex ,age and normal post-anticoagulation D-dimer as risk factors for recurrence after idiopathic venous thromboembolism in the Prolong study extension. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(9):1933-1942. [24] Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, et al. VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101(5):886-892. [25] Boissier C, Lacroix P; Collège des enseignants de médecine vasculaire. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Rev Prat. 2012;62(10):1447-1455. [26] Johnson SA, Stevens SM, Woller SC, et al. Risk of deep vein thrombosis following a single negative whole-leg compression ultrasound: a systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA. 2010;303(5):438-445. [27] Di Nisio M, Van Sluis GL, Bossuyt PM, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic tests for clinically suspected upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:684-692. [28] 唐春香,张龙江,卢光明.慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压[J].医学研究生学报,2012,25(10):1092-1096. [29] Cronin P, Weg JG, Kazerooni EA.The role of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;386:418-431. [30] Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2007;2452:315-329. [31] Hales CA, Denier JE, Weg JG, et al. CT venous phase venography with 64-detector CT angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2010; 16(4):422-429. [32] Muangman N, Totanarungroj K.Cost effectiveness of combined CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and indirect CTV in patient with intermediate to high probability for pulmonary embolism.J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95(10): 1321-3126. [33] Fink C, Henzler T, Shirinova A, et al. Thoracic magnetic resonance imaging: pulmonary thromboembolism. J Thorac Imaging. 2013;28(3):171-177. [34] Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:434-443, W142-143. [35] 顾康康,穆巍,秦国初,等. 脑静脉窦血栓的MR与CT诊断对比研究[J]. 医学研究生学报,2009,22(6):627-631. [36] Wilbur J, Shian B. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Am Fam Physician. 2012;86(10): p. 913-919. [37] Taillefer R,Edell S,Innes G,et al.Acute thromboscintigraphy with (99m)Tc-apcitide: results of the phase 3 multicenter clinical trial comparing 99mTc-apcitide scintigraphy with contrast venography for imaging acute DVT. Multicenter Trial Investigators.J Nucl Med. 2000;(41):1214-1223. [38] Genét GF, Ostrowski SR, Sørensen AM, et al. Detection of tPA-induced hyperfibrinolysis in whole blood by RapidTEG, KaolinTEG, and functional fibrinogenTEG in healthy individuals. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012;18(6): 638-644. [39] Dai Y,Lee A,Critchley LA,et al.Does thromboelastography predict postoperative thromboembolic events?A systematic review of the literature. Anesth Analg. 2009;(108):734-742. [40] King AD, Bell SD, Stuttle AW, et al. Platelet imaging of thromboembolism. Natural history of postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism illustrated using the 111In-labelled platelet-specific monoclonal antibody, P256. Chest. 1992;101(6):1597-1600. [41] Hou H, Ge Z, Ying P, et al. Biomarkers of deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012;34(3):335-346. [42] Coleman DM, Wakefield TW. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2012;6(4): 253-257. [43] Cui MZ. Lysophosphatidic acid effects on atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Clin Lipidol. 2011;6(4):413-426. [44] 中华医学会骨科学分会. 预防骨科大手术深静脉血栓形成指南(草案) [J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(2): 118-119. [45] 邱贵兴,杨庆铭. 低分子肝素预防髋、膝关节手术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的多中心研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2006,26(12): 819-822. [46] Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stahle H, et al. The pharmaco kinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64(3):292-303. [47] Stangier J, Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, et al. Pharmaco kinetic profile of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in healthyvolunteers and patients undergoing total hip replacement. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45(5):555-563. [48] Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2342-2352. [49] Roehrig S, Straub A, Pohlmann J, et al. Discovery of the novelantithrombotic agent thiophene-2-carboxamide(BAY 59-7939):an oral,direct factor Xa inhibitor. J Med Chem. 2005; 48(19): 5900-5908. [50] Kakkar AK, Brenner B, Dahl OE, et al. Extended duration rivaroxaban versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372 (9632):31-39. |
[1] | Zhou Qi, Gao Yi, Wei Kang, Li Jun, Xu Jianda, Jiang Yang, Qu Yuxing. Total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: knee function and biochemical index changes [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2020, 24(9): 1337-1341. |
[2] | Han Guangtao, Li Haohuan. Influence of the concept of fast track surgery on the physiological and psychological rehabilitation of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2019, 23(36): 5760-5765. |
[3] | He Wei, Lou Zhenkai, Wang Bing, Li Xingguo, Zhao Chongyu, Zhao Xueling. Resveratrol protects endothelial cells from oxidative damage and inhibits expression of pro-thrombosis molecules: the underlying mechanisms [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2019, 23(3): 464-469. |
[4] | Zhong Yanchun, Liu Lulin, Xiao Jianhua, Ouyang Xunyan, Huang Weimin, Liu Wuyang. postoperative blood loss of intertrochanteric fracture: a meta-analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2019, 23(28): 4584-4592. |
[5] |
Lu Zhan, Shi Junlong, Liu Peidong, Lei Hongwei, Yang Ziquan.
Intravenous infusion versus local application of tranexamic acid in primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2019, 23(24): 3931-3936.
|
[6] | Zhou Jianguo, Hu Weiquan, Bi Shengrong, Hu Bijuan, Liu Shiwei, Xiong Long, Qian Rui. Clinical application of individualized tourniquet pressure in primary total knee arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2019, 23(20): 3136-3142. |
[7] | Zhao Chong-yu, Wang Bing, Lou Zhen-kai, Li Xing-guo, He Wei, Zhao Xue-ling. Expression levels of SIRT1 and oxidative stress injury markers in a mouse model of deep venous thrombosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(28): 4518-4524. |
[8] | Zhang Li-qing, Wei Kai-bin, Zhu Ben-ke, Wang Qiang, Li Chun-pu. Rational application of tranexamic acid and drainage tube in total knee arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(27): 4282-4287. |
[9] | Li Ming, Wan Fa-qing, Zhang Ying-hua, Jia Tang-hong, Luo Gong-zeng, Ju Liang, Huang Shou-guo. Effects of close reduction intramedullary nailing fixation on perioperative venous thrombosis-related indicators [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(23): 3609-3614. |
[10] | Dou Zhe, Yang Yun, Huang Jian. Perioperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: measures and countermeasures [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(23): 3716-3722. |
[11] | Bai Yun-fei, Fang Ti-gang, Sun Rui. Rivaroxaban and low molecular heparin in prevention of deep venous thrombosis and blood loss after total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(15): 2303-2308. |
[12] | Zhang Hang, Zhang Zhi-qiang, He Qiang, He Yun-li, Zhang Qian, Feng Zhe, Li Yan, He Sen. Efficacy and safety of aspirin for venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(15): 2321-2326. |
[13] | Gu Pei-lun, Dong Jin-bo, Wang Wei-shan, Chen Lei, Yu Hong-tao, Li Yue-jun, Gao Peng, Wang Kai . A meta-analysis of pneumatic tourniquet used in total knee arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(15): 2446-2452. |
[14] | Gao Xi-xiang, Zhang Jian, Gu Yong-quan, Guo Lian-rui, Tong Zhu, Li Li-qiang, Li Jian-xin, Feng Zeng-guo. A new self-convertible inferior vena cava filter: in vivo experimental evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(14): 2215-2220. |
[15] | Gao Xi-xiang, Zhang Jian, Gu Yong-quan, Guo Lian-rui, Tong Zhu, Li Li-qiang, Li Jian-xin, Feng Zeng-guo. A new self-convertible inferior vena cava filter: in vitro experimental evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(10): 1547-1552. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||